We Live In 1723, Not in 2022 – Independent Scientists Comes With Evidences

by | Dec 19, 2021 | Earth, Science, Space, Unexplained | 0 comments

It is nothing new that more and more independent researchers and conspirators conclude that three centuries have been lost in the history of humanity. But how is that possible?

According to the study of many historical documents, researchers came to the conclusion that the years between the eighth and the 11th century are very scarcely documented and sometimes even incongruous as if they exist.

In addition, there is some evidence to indicate the loss of the three centuries from our history. For example, the construction of Constantinople mysteriously interrupted that period for three centuries only after it resumed.

We Live In 1723, Not in 2022 - Independent Scientists Comes With Evidences 3

The same can be applied to the Aachen Cathedral in Germany. At the same time, such chronological inconsistencies can be found in China. So this may indicate that we are living in another year like 2019.

There are irreversible documents indicating the loss of three centuries. Thus, the grand construction was closed in Constantinople of that period for some reason suddenly … for three centuries and then suddenly resumed.

The exact same absurdity can be traced when building the Aachen Cathedral in Germany. And there are too many inconsistencies.

This huge leap in the timeline of history may have been a result of some confusion when the Pope switched from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar of 1582 A.D., where there was an anomaly of at least 10 days.

“Perhaps there was an incorrect interpretation of documents somewhere along the line because falsified historical documents are not necessarily rare. But maybe there was no accident at all.  Nikol Ertman, a professor at the University of Tallinn, said.

We Live In 1723, Not in 2022 - Independent Scientists Comes With Evidences 4

We all know that history was and still is manipulated by the ruling classes to suit their needs – take a look at what happened in Ukraine. But the ultimate question is how have three centuries of our past completely disappeared?

Heribert Illig believed that this was achieved through change, misrepresentation, and falsification of documentary and physical evidence. According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the Charlemagne figure, is a fabrication, with a “phantom time” of 297 years (614-911 e.Kr.) added in the early Middle Ages.



So it is very possible that we live in 1723 and not 2022.

So, do we really live in 1723? Some scientists seem to think so. They say that the estimates for the year of the apocalypse, 2022, have been miscalculated and that we should actually be looking at 1723. How do they come to this conclusion? By analyzing ancient manuscripts and studying astronomical patterns, among>write blog title ideas here other things. While this may sound like a crazy theory, some people are actually convinced by it.

Why do these scientists believe that the year of the apocalypse has been miscalculated? One of the main pieces of evidence they point to is the study of ancient manuscripts. They claim that certain manuscripts contain clues that suggest that the true date of the apocalypse is 1723, and not 2022. Another piece of evidence they cite is the study of astronomical patterns. According to these scientists, the alignment of certain planets suggests that 1723 is the correct year.

While this theory may sound crazy, there are some people who actually believe it.

So, what do you think? Do we live in 1723 or 2022?

The answer is up to you to decide.

Did We Really Lose Three Centuries? Unearthing The Time Paradox

In the era of the internet, where information flows at the speed of light and history is documented with the click of a button, the idea that three entire centuries might be missing from our historical record seems both ludicrous and tantalizing. Yet, a growing group of independent researchers suggest just that. But how could such a significant time lapse happen, and why isn’t it widely discussed?

The Phantom Time Hypothesis

The cornerstone of this argument is the ‘Phantom Time Hypothesis’ formulated by Heribert Illig in the 1990s. Illig proposed that the Early Middle Ages (614-911 AD) never happened. Instead, these years were added to the calendar due to errors, misinterpretations, or deliberate falsifications by historians or political leaders.

The motivation? Some suggest it might have been done to place certain rulers at the millennial milestone of 1000 AD, giving them a divine right or significant mandate. Others theorize that it might have been a simple mistake during calendar reforms, which was then too embarrassing to correct.

Evidence in Architecture and Art

Detractors of the Phantom Time Hypothesis point out the numerous architectural and artistic developments from the supposed ‘lost centuries’. The rise of the Carolingian Renaissance, the spread of Christianity throughout Scandinavia, and the emergence of Islamic Golden Age cannot simply be brushed aside.

However, proponents counter by saying that these events and advancements were either pre-dated, happened in a much shorter time frame, or were misattributed.

Astronomical Records and Radiocarbon Dating

One of the most compelling arguments against the missing centuries comes from the field of astronomy. Historical records of solar eclipses, comets, and other celestial events align perfectly with our current understanding of time. Furthermore, radiocarbon dating of organic material from the supposed phantom period corresponds to the dates they should be from.

A Question of Consequences

Let’s hypothesize for a moment that these researchers are onto something, and we did lose three centuries. What are the implications? For starters, our understanding of historical events, lineage, and developments would be thrown into chaos. Artifacts, records, and stories from the ‘phantom time’ would need to be re-analyzed, re-dated, and re-contextualized.

Moreover, our very perception of time, a construct so foundational to human civilization, would be challenged. It would prompt many to ponder the fragility of our collective memory and how easily history, as we know it, can be molded, shaped, or even erased.

In Conclusion

While the debate around the Phantom Time Hypothesis is fascinating, it remains fringe and is not widely accepted by mainstream historians. It serves as a potent reminder, however, of the mysteries that still persist about our past and the endless quest for truth that drives human curiosity.

The journey through our history is filled with unexpected twists and tales, and while we might never know with certainty if we’ve lost centuries, the exploration of such enigmas makes the narrative of human civilization all the more intriguing.


Send this to a friend